AI-Assisted Editorial Decision Making in Open Journal Systems (OJS): A Framework for Manuscript Scope Analysis and Reviewer Recommendation

Authors

  • Besiki Tabatadze PhD (Applied Mathematics), Affiliated Professor, European University, Tbilisi, Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4809-150X
  • Teimuraz Sturua PhD (Mathematician), Professor, European University, Tbilisi, Georgia Author
  • Nika Tabatadze MSc (Informatics), Invited Lecturer, European University, Tbilisi, Georgia Author
  • Ekaterine Natsvlishvili PhD (Social Philosophy), MA (Management), Affiliated Professor, European University, Tbilisi, Georgia Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Open Journal Systems (OJS), Natural Language Processing, TF-IDF, Cosine Similarity, Manuscript Scope Analysis, Reviewer Recommendation

Abstract

The increasing volume of manuscript submissions has created significant challenges for editorial boards in maintaining efficient and consistent editorial workflows. Initial manuscript screening, assessment of manuscript relevance to the journal scope, and identification of appropriate reviewers are among the most time-consuming tasks in academic publishing. Although Open Journal Systems (OJS) provides a comprehensive platform for managing editorial processes, these tasks are still performed primarily through manual evaluation.

This study presents an AI-assisted editorial support framework designed for Open Journal Systems (OJS). The proposed approach applies natural language processing techniques to analyze manuscript titles, abstracts, keywords, and reviewer expertise profiles. Textual information is transformed into numerical representations using the Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) vectorization method, while cosine similarity is employed to measure semantic relevance between submitted manuscripts, journal scope descriptions, and reviewer expertise. Based on these similarity scores, the system recommends the most relevant journal scope categories and suitable reviewers for each submitted manuscript.

The proposed framework is implemented as a Python-based prototype and demonstrates the feasibility of integrating artificial intelligence into editorial workflows without replacing the role of the editor. Instead, the system functions as an intelligent decision-support tool that provides transparent and consistent recommendations during the initial manuscript screening process. The proposed approach has the potential to reduce editorial workload, improve reviewer assignment, and enhance the overall efficiency of manuscript management within Open Journal Systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python. O'Reilly Media.

Edgar, B., & Willinsky, J. (2010). A survey of the scholarly journals using Open Journal Systems. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1(2), 1–22.

Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2009). Speech and language processing (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Kowsari, K., Heidarysafa, M., Brown, D. E., Meimandi, K. J., & Barnes, L. E. (2019). Text classification algorithms: A survey. Information, 10(4), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10040150

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. E. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Dartmouth College.

Minciună, V., & Țurcan, N. (2025). Journal editors' views on scientific publishing in the Republic of Moldova: Results of a national survey. Revista Română de Biblioteconomie și Știința Informării, 21(1), 22–40.

OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774

Owen, B. (2012). The Public Knowledge Project and Open Journal Systems. PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference Proceedings.

Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386–408.

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0

Safitri, R. M. (2026). Analysis of risk factors for computer vision syndrome (CVS) among journal management staff utilizing Open Journal Systems (OJS). Smart: Journal of Healthcare, 1(1), 68–92.

Sebastiani, F. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/505282.505283

Smith, R. (2006). The trouble with medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(3), 115–119.

Tabatadze, B. (2024). Prospects of using AI technologies in Open Journal Systems (OJS). Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, 8(2), 68–74.

Tabatadze, B. (2024). Technological aspects of Open Journal Systems (OJS). Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, 8(1), 23–29.

Tabatadze, B. (2026). AI-assisted programming in practice: Conceptual foundations and data-informed observations. Computational and Applied Science, 1(1), 84–100.

Tabatadze, B., & Sokhadze, E. (2023). Possibility of improving the training courses content based on statistical analysis of the collected points. Globalization and Business, 8(15), 54–56.

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Willinsky, J. (2005). Open Journal Systems: An example of open source software for journal management and publishing. Library Hi Tech, 23(4), 504–519.

Downloads

Published

02-08-2026

How to Cite

AI-Assisted Editorial Decision Making in Open Journal Systems (OJS): A Framework for Manuscript Scope Analysis and Reviewer Recommendation. (2026). Computational and Applied Science, 1(2), 83-102. https://casjournal.ge/index.php/cas/article/view/22